Loan provisions: A strategy for sustainability during uncertainty

 

 

Indonesia’s economic growth was contracted by 2.07 percent (yoy) by 2020 with the peak of the recession of 5.32 percent in the second quarter of 2020. Meanwhile, Indonesian Banking Industry also recorded negative growth for loans and profitability. Non-performing loans and loans at risk were rising, hence banks have significantly increased their loan loss provisions or allowance for impairment losses (CKPN).

In theory, loan loss provision has a vital role in maintaining the soundness of a bank in fulfilling the intermediary function. When a bank disbursed loans to customers, it will be exposed to credit risk – the risk that the borrower may not pay back the loan. To offset this credit risk, banks have to provide credit loss provision. This provision illustrates an estimate of the expected loss of the loan. In December 2020, the absolute value of loan loss provision for Indonesian Bank recorded at Rp304.2 trillion, an increase of 84.7 percent compared to December 2019 of Rp164,7 trillion. The sharp increase in loan loss provision has shown that Indonesian banks expected a significant increase in credit losses. 

To measure sufficient coverage on credit losses, a ratio commonly used is Loan Loss Reserves (LLR). The nominator of this ratio is loan loss provision and the denominator is loan outstanding. LLR rose from 2,9% in December 2019 to 5.5 percent in December 2020. This illustrates higher appetite in loan loss coverage. Another parameter used in measuring loan loss coverage is NPL Coverage ratio, which is total loan loss provision over outstanding Non-Performing Loans (NPL). This NPL Coverage ratio in the industry has increased significantly from 116,09 percent in 2019 to 181,37 percent in 2020.

 

The Triggers

The increase in loan loss provision in 2020 was actually triggered by both macro economic downturn due to the Covid pandemic, as well as regulatory requirements. The regulatory trigger was the implementation of IFRS 9 or PSAK 71 in Indonesia starting from January 2020. 

IFRS 9 is an International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Global implementation of IFRS 9 was starting 1 January 2018 while in Indonesia, The Financial Services Authority (OJK), Bank Indonesia (BI), DAI and Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia (IAI) decided that PSAK 71 Financial instruments, the Indonesian version of IFRS 9, would be effective starting 1 January 2020. 

Under IFRS 9, the definition of credit loss changes from incurred loss to expected loss, which includes forward-looking calibration based on macroeconomic variables. Moreover, for financial assets with significant increase in credit risk, although the account is still categorized as performing, the provision is calculated using lifetime expected credit losses. Therefore, this new standard has increased loan loss Provision significantly. 

Due to the high increase in provision calculated based on PSAK 71 compared to PSAK 55, banks were allowed to use their equity to increase the loan loss provision. However, only a few banks used the adjustment. Most banks choose to lower their profitability and increase the impairment cost to fulfill the new standard. According to the Financial Services Authority (OJK), during the beginning of 2020 when the IFRS 9 implementation started, impairment cost increased around 53 percent yoy, from Rp159,8 trillion in January 2019 to Rp246 trillion in January 2020. 

The other factor triggering increase in loan loss provision was changes in macroeconomic conditions. With the COVID-19 outbreak disrupting the economy, banks’ customers are experiencing difficulties in paying back their loan. Therefore, non-performing loans and restructured loans has been increasing. Combined with forward-looking calibration in provision calculations made loan loss provisions has gone through the roof.

Besides increase in NPLs, according to OJK, restructured loans have reached Rp. 971 trillion or around 18 percent of total bank’s loan, including 7.6 million debtors. Restructured loan due to COVID-19 was classified as current collectability or performing asset classed as long as there are no delay payment in interest or/and principal more than 30 days. 

Under PSAK 71, restructured loans were classified as stage 2 in which provision should be calculated using lifetime expected credit losses. Thus, it would significantly increase loan loss provision that should set aside by banks. Higher provisions will erode bank’s profitability and capital that would cause solvency risk for banks. To prevent it, OJK allowed banks to classify restructured loans due to COVID-19 as stage 1 in which provision was calculated for 12 month expected loss and not lifetime. With this relaxation, banks can book lower provision than it should have and prevent from losses.

 

Pros and Cons

In international economics, the policy trilemma or the impossible trinity which states impossible to have all three of the following at the same time: a fixed foreign exchange rate, free capital movement (absence of capital controls), and an independent monetary policy. In banking, when the crisis, impossible (generally) to have all three of the following at the same time are sustainability, profitability, and liquidity. 

As an Intermediary institution, the banking industry has a significant impact on the economy. Because sustainability and liquidity are more important than profitability, so increasing in loan provision is one of the strategy for sustainability during uncertainty. In the course of difficult economic condition, loan loss provision will spiked as borrowers struggled to repay their debt. When the economy later stabilized, these metrics will fell closer to their pre-recession levels.

Although with OJK’s relaxation, most banks actually choose to be conservative in anticipating credit overhang, as shown by the high growth in loan loss provisions and negative growth of their net profit. This also demonstrates that there are still elements of uncertainty in 2021. 

To manage the uncertainty and drastic changes in external conditions such as regulatory relaxation, IFRS 9 or PSAK 71 allows banks to add overlays to their provision using expert judgement method, when management feels that the provisions calculated by the IFRS engine is not sufficient. In this avenue, Risk Management plays a vital role in deciding sufficient loan loss coverage, hence analytics and simulations are rapidly used to decide a proper number, sufficient and not excessive.

 Sumber: https://www.thejakartapost.com/adv/2021/04/23/loan-provisions-a-strategy-for-sustainability-during-uncertainty.html

 Wita Adriawati and Akbar Suwardi
(Credit Risk Specialist at Bank Rakyat Indonesia), 

 

-00- 



This article was published in thejakartapost.com with the title "Loan provisions: A strategy for sustainability during uncertainty". Click to read: https://www.thejakartapost.com/adv/2021/04/23/loan-provisions-a-strategy-for-sustainability-during-uncertainty.html.


Download The Jakarta Post app for easier and faster news access:
Android: http://bit.ly/tjp-android
iOS: http://bit.ly/tjp-ios

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Random Effect Model (REM)

Linear Probability Model (LPM), Logit Model, dan Probit Model (Normit Model) dengan STATA (2011)

Pooled Least Square (PLS)